The New TV Series "MythBusters: The Search" just started today (Sunday - 01/08/17) on the Science Channel with episode 1, with a new episode starting next week on Saturday (01/14/17) along with a rerun episode of episode 1.
This TV Series is trying to find the next hosts for the next gen. of MythBusters, so course they introduce the next possible hosts with 10 different people where half of them has a degree in science in something while the other half are experiences builder in their field related to science.
They only did 2 myth on this episode and by the end of the episode, one of the "possible hosts" was voted out by the judge behind this new TV Series (to find a new host) because it is a contest. Now there 9 left.
I don't want to spoil who got voted out/kick out/judge out for people who hasn't watch the episode yet but I can tell why that person was chosen.
In My own word and how I see it and interpret it from what the TV stated (There Niche Was Too Small); That the person that was voted out was because they could not adapt well or quickly enough outside their field of expertise. That why they stated what they stated on the TV series.
-------------------------------------
Now about the two myth they did on this episode with none spoiler like statement from me. The 1st myth they did as a team while the second myth they did it as individual. While I don't question the result of both myth because I believe they (The TV people, not the contestant) chosen these to test the contestant of their overall abilities for the show. I do however question the methodology in which they did the second myth. My main point; too many "human factor" in the data collocation.
No comments:
Post a Comment